I’m not here to justify
Disarm your opponent by not allowing their emotion fueled argument to shift your values. Property rights are the most basic human right. Bastian expanded basic property rights with: ‘The Law‘. He identified liberty, property, and life as rights destroyed by political law. To keep with the times I found a meme talking about how the left is wrong for some reason because they identified a name wrong. The meme is a foolish argument. There is no place for discussion in what I want to call my defense of property. This politicizing would take rights away if the wrong term were used.
These rights aren’t up for discussion:
Slavery
According to Bastiat, from property rights comes the right to own your own productivity, or liberty if we can agree that liberty is freedom from slavery. If someone were to force you to work and keep the output of your labor, you need an AR-15 or better until that force against you is gone. Once you have traded your work for a paycheck, you’re free to defend that paycheck in anyway you see fit.
Plunder and the Right to Live
And in addition to liberty, you may protect your land and other belongings. The rules of nature say only you will be the one to decide what property you require to stay alive. Anything else is plunder. Which leads to the last part of perversion of political law: you must be able to protect your life. So I would be giving up my basic rights if I were to say what the AR-15 is or isn’t to someone who would be taking it away.
Conclusion
Rights exist without government. They are the most essential needs to protect the natural requirements of life. I will keep my rifle and call it what I feel, to fight for my life.